Danish Lead Co
From zero citations to 170 across 535 tracked AI answers.
Before
In our first measurement pass on danishleadco.io (27 July 2026), zero AI-cited sources across the tracked buyer-question set pointed back to us. Danish Lead Co was named in 7% of answers, but never cited as a source.
After
By our most recent measurement (4 September 2026), across an expanded set of 535 tracked AI answers, danishleadco.io now has 170 citations recorded across those answers, up from 0 (about 0.32 citations per tracked answer). Brand mentions rose from 7 to 26 over the same window.
What changed
danishleadco.io ran through the same AEO program we run for clients: a genuinely answer-first content structure (original data-backed pages, comparison tables, an FAQ layer with matching schema), and a growing evergreen blog built specifically to be the source an AI answer engine can lift a passage from, rather than to rank in a traditional search results page.
Why this matters
Citation share, not just brand mentions, is what determines whether an AI answer engine treats a site as a source worth naming when it answers a buyer's question. Going from zero citations to 170 in six weeks is the kind of movement we look for before we call a program working.
Source: SourceRank AI's own measurement engine, tracked prompt set for danishleadco.io. Snapshots: 27 July 2026 (100 tracked responses) and 4 September 2026 (535 tracked responses).
See the other side of this program
DealSource Systems case study
A newer, faster-growing site: an honest read on early mentions and citations, including where citation share has not moved yet.
Read the case study ->See your own visibility gap
Get a real baseline across every answer engine before you decide what to do next.
Start a conversation ->